GAY TRUTH

Rather than help individuals find solutions for gender dysphoria, Catholic parish leaders were encouraged at a recent national workshop to incorporate “transgender” issues into religious education and preach at Mass about the “needs, concerns and joys of transgender people.” In addition to proselytizing about transgenderism at Mass and other prayer gatherings, catechists at the Los Angeles Religious Education Congress ( LA REC ) workshop were encouraged to bring transgender people in for panel discussions and to “recognize” and/or have a parish presence at “public transgender events.” " Transgender in the Family: One Bread, One Body" was a  Saturday  session at the Congress that ran February 24-26 with a related Youth Day before the general Congress. “Transgender” session attendees learned how to “ be sensitive, loving and supportive of transgender Catholics and their families in the midst of transition,” according to the workshop description, and were presen

Homosexuals objected to the Australian PM attending their nudity parade. Because they didn't want every Australians voting on homosexual marriage. They wanted to change the definition of marriage by using politicians who are either homosexual themselves or who they could move across to their immoral view. They wanted to manipulate a few politicians to vote on homosexual marriage.  Along with his wife Lucy, Australian PM Mr Turnbull has been a regular attendee of the Mardi Gras homosexual nudity parade , including last year when he became the first sitting prime minister to attend the celebration .  Why would a PM do this? To save his seat - to fracture his conservative voters - to support immoral homosexual sin?   LGBTQ zealots know most Australians would vote against homosexual marriage. Why?  Because they know the LGBTQ zealots will not stop at marriage. If you disagree not only do they call you a bigot or hater, they will drag you to court, shut your business down,

Immoral homosexual marriage has been pushed onto all USA citizens for almost two years with a slim one- vote majority, but normal people are looking to fight this unbalanced  U.S. Supreme Court ruling through a lawsuit challenging Houston 's benefits for immoral homosexual couples. This is a wonderful thing! Almost two years after immoral homosexual marriage was legalized and forced onto all US citizens, Texas Republicans are correctly fighting this unjust immoral debauched ruling. The Texas Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on Wednesday in a Houston case challenging the city’s benefits policy for married same-sex couples. Though such policies have been in place since the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark 2015 ruling in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges , Texas conservatives are betting the Houston case opens up a path to relitigate the high court’s decision. “This particular opinion will go to the U.S. Supreme Court and is a potential vehicle for overturning Obergefell

A Washington floral artist says she will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse a  decision  Thursday by the state’s high court that concluded the government can force her—and, by extension, other Washingtonians—to create artistic expression and participate in events with which they disagree. Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys represent Richland floral artist Barronelle Stutzman, whom the state attorney general and the American Civil Liberties Union sued for acting consistently with her faith. “This case is about crushing dissent. In a free America , people with differing beliefs must have room to coexist,” said ADF Senior Counsel Kristen Waggoner, who  argued before the court  together with co-counsel George Ahrend  in November of last year . “It’s wrong for the state to force any citizen to support a particular view about marriage or anything else against their will. Freedom of speech and religion aren’t subject to the whim of a majority; they are constitutional guar

It is no wonder Australia's PM M. Turnbull is loosing votes when he attend the annual immoral debauchery call Gay Pride Parade in Sydney - does he not think? The day after Valentine's Day , there was an apparent outbreak of love in Parliament amongst Senators on opposite sides of the same-sex marriage debate. There had been a meeting of minds and hearts, it seemed. Consensus had been reached on a pathway forward for so called "marriage equality", it was asserted. The trigger for this goodwill and warm feelings was the tabling of a Senate Select Committee report examining the potential impacts of redefining marriage on religious freedom. It was significant that it was tabled without the usual dissenting report attached. Labor, Greens, Liberal and Nationals Senators had agreed that some religious freedom should be protected and that Australians who were not professional pastors would have their rights and freedoms impacted should marriage law ever change. Consequ

Dear Mr. President and Mr. Vice-President , I write this letter as a supporter and advocate, not a critic or adversary. As someone who voted for you and who regularly calls on millions of Americans to pray for you. I also write this with the understanding that you have been elected to serve the American people as a whole and not just one particular faction of Americans. The great challenge, however, is one that you must deal with on a daily basis: When you stand up for what you believe is right — be it securing our borders or nominating a solid pro-life justice to the Supreme Court — you will alienate a certain number of Americans who oppose your policies and choices. That is inevitable, although regrettable, but if there is any political leader on the planet who is more concerned with acting on convictions than with pleasing people, it is you. And this brings me to the heart of this appeal. While you have consistently positioned yourself as a friend of the LGBT community during y

Two homosexuals who bullied a grandma After much anticipation, the Washington State Supreme Court has punished Barronelle Stutzman for peacefully operating her business consistently with her faith. Barronelle's continuing struggle for religious freedom should be alarming not only to every Christian , but to every American who cherishes freedom. Barronelle is a floral artist … and a grandmother. You’d never expect to see someone like her at the center of a firestorm.  But she is being sued both professionally and personally by the Washington State attorney general and the ACLU . This ruling could result in her losing everything she owns — her business, her home, and her life’s savings. Everything. The ACLU recently raised $24 million. We know they use their money to bully good, loving people like Barronelle. Why has Barronelle been targeted? It all began when a longtime friend and client, Rob Ingersoll, asked her to create custom floral arrangements for his s

Barronelle Stutzman may be held personally liable for millions of dollars merely for refusing to provide a floral arrangement for a same-sex marriage. The Washington State Supreme Court today unanimously upheld a judgment against a florist who declined to create a floral arrangement for a same-sex marriage. She had previously provided the gay couple flowers for other occasions, but told them she couldn’t supply flowers for their “wedding,” because same-sex marriage was incompatible with her Christian beliefs. The court held that the government can force individuals to provide artistic works and participate in events they disagree with. The nine justices claimed that Barronelle Stutzman violated anti-discrimination and consumer protection laws. The court found her personally accountable, meaning the state can seize her home, personal property, savings and bank accounts to pay any damages fines or attorneys fees awarded against her. The Court Says: No Violation of Her Rights A So

A Christian homeschooling mom alleged that Facebook removed her post on homosexuality and sin in error. Elizabeth Johnston, a blogger at “The Activist Mommy,” said Facebook suspended her account due to comments she made on homosexuality over six months ago, reports Heat Street . Johnston, responded to a woman who argued over Facebook that Christians are hypocritical when it comes to their stance on homosexuality. “Here again is the concept of natural sexual relations vs. unnatural. Homosexuality is unnatural and perverse, an abuse of our sexual facilities. It is ‘shameful,’” part of Johnston’s post read. Facebook froze her public account “The Activist Mommy” Feb. 9 and took down the post, saying it did not follow their community guidelines. “I responded with just scriptural commentary and that is considered ‘ hate speech ’ by Facebook. It was just very intellectual and it was just a commentary on what the Bible says. There was no name calling or anything like that,” Johnston s

At the same time as Ohio legislators consider a bill to protect the religious freedom of churches and pastors, a prominent Ohio gay activist has admitted that her group does indeed want to force churches to rent their facilities to homosexuals for receptions, weddings, dinners, and meetings. The surprising admission came as legislators are debating  Ohio Pastors Protection Act (HB-36 ). The bill would protect pastors from forced participation in homosexual ‘marriages’ and allow churches to refuse to rent space for ceremonies or activities “that do not conform” to the church’s “sincerely held religious beliefs .” The sponsor of the bill, Rep. Nino Vitale, recently debated Alana Jochum, executive director of the LGBTQ advocacy group " Equality Ohio ," on NPR . Rep. Vitale explained to LifeSiteNews, "Basically, I've been trying to get them to admit that they are going after church facilities." During the NPR interview, Vitale asked if churches shou