Posts

Showing posts with the label Sexually transmitted disease

Smoking is much healthier than Homosexuality

Image
Homosexual activists attempt to portray their lifestyle as normal and healthy, and insist that homosexual relationships are the equivalent in every way to their heterosexual counterparts. Hollywood and the media relentlessly propagate the image of the fit, healthy, and well-adjusted homosexual. The reality is quite opposite to this caricature which was recently conceded by the homosexual newspaper  New York Blade News: Reports at a national conference about sexually transmitted diseases indicate that gay men are in the highest risk group for several of the most serious diseases. . . . Scientists believe that the increased number of sexually tranmitted diseases ( STD ) cases is the result of an increase in risky sexual practices by a growing number of gay men who believe HIV is no longer a life-threatening illness. [1] Instability and promiscuity typically characterize homosexual relationships. These two factors increase the incidence of serious and incurable stds. In addition

HIV increasing due to risky sexual sin or homophobia?

Image
English: Diagram of the HIV virus. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Despite overwhelming medical evidence that AIDS is exponentially growing among homosexuals because of behavioral risks, the widely read medical journal Lancet is telling the medical community that " homophobia is a key driver" of the growing epidemic. And the Lancet is calling for the decriminalization of homosexual behavior and the removal of any stigma and discrimination attached to homosexuality. In a new series of papers, "HIV in Men Who Have Sex with Men ", Lancet delves deeply into the root causes of the HIV pandemic among homosexuals , analyzing the biological, behavioral , and structural risks that affect men having sex with men. The series was presented at a symposium during the AIDS 2012 conference last week in Washington D.C. presented by Professor Chris Beyrer from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health . The findings of the papers are contradictory. On the one hand the p